[ad_1]
Despite a tough macroeconomic backdrop, analysts at BofA Securities expect FTC Solar Inc.’s FTCI volumes and margins to rebound in the coming years as industry-wide solar panel supply improves and delayed projects are completed.
The FTC Solar Analyst: BofA’s Julien Dumoulin-Smith double upgraded FTCI to a Buy rating from Underperform, while raising the price target from $2 to $3.50.
The FTC Solar Takeaways: The introduction of new products, the expansion of the client base and the expansion of the company’s foreign presence as the primary drivers of top-line expansion, Dumoulin-Smith said in the note.
In terms of fundamentals, the analyst believed FTCI provides leverage to utility scale solar’s recovery through a structural inflection in financials.
According to updated projections by BofA, increased volumes and a more efficient operational expenses (opex) structure will drive FTCI’s EBITDA margin to increase to $31.3 million from $19.8 million in 2024 and to $57.1 million from $32.2 million in 2025.
Nonetheless, according to BofA, FTC Solar’s narrative continues to entail a “significant execution risk,” but because expectations are sufficiently low, management has adequate room to reestablish confidence with the Street.
See Also: Why BP, Exxon Mobil, Marathon Oil, Occidental And Shell Stock Are Getting Hammered
FTCI Price Action: On March 15, 2023, FTC Solar had a wild volatile session. Shares rose as high as 15% to $2.79 in the first hour of trading before giving back all of the gains and finished 0.41% down on the day.
FTC Solar dropped by 16.5% over the previous week and 9.7% over the past month. Likewise, the year-to-date performance is negative by 9.5%, and the stock price is 61% lower than it was a year ago.
The 50-day moving average (MA) is at $2.79, which is 15.4% higher than current prices. The 200-day MA is at $3.30, which is 36.3% higher than current prices.
Read Next: Are EVs As Clean As You Think? US Still Has A ‘Dirty Grid’ Problem, But Solar Set To Clear The Air
Photo: Diyana Dimitrova via Shutterstock
[ad_2]
Image and article originally from www.benzinga.com. Read the original article here.