[ad_1]
Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in iTeos Therapeutics Inc (Symbol: ITOS), where a total of 1,085 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 108,500 underlying shares. That amounts to about 47% of ITOS’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 230,900 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $22.50 strike call option expiring March 17, 2023, with 1,000 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 100,000 underlying shares of ITOS. Below is a chart showing ITOS’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $22.50 strike highlighted in orange:
ConocoPhillips (Symbol: COP) saw options trading volume of 36,330 contracts, representing approximately 3.6 million underlying shares or approximately 46.8% of COP’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 7.8 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $110 strike call option expiring May 19, 2023, with 4,323 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 432,300 underlying shares of COP. Below is a chart showing COP’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $110 strike highlighted in orange:
And Qualcomm Inc (Symbol: QCOM) options are showing a volume of 35,120 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 3.5 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 46.3% of QCOM’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 7.6 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $120 strike put option expiring March 17, 2023, with 3,394 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 339,400 underlying shares of QCOM. Below is a chart showing QCOM’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $120 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for ITOS options, COP options, or QCOM options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
PE History
Institutional Holders of ADCT
Indie Semiconductor Historical Earnings
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
[ad_2]
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.