[ad_1]
Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Crocs Inc (Symbol: CROX), where a total of 8,169 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 816,900 underlying shares. That amounts to about 47.7% of CROX’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 1.7 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $110 strike put option expiring March 17, 2023, with 1,541 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 154,100 underlying shares of CROX. Below is a chart showing CROX’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $110 strike highlighted in orange:
Duck Creek Technologies Inc (Symbol: DCT) saw options trading volume of 6,996 contracts, representing approximately 699,600 underlying shares or approximately 47.6% of DCT’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.5 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $20 strike call option expiring March 17, 2023, with 6,319 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 631,900 underlying shares of DCT. Below is a chart showing DCT’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $20 strike highlighted in orange:
And Newmont Corp (Symbol: NEM) saw options trading volume of 32,854 contracts, representing approximately 3.3 million underlying shares or approximately 46.7% of NEM’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 7.0 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $45 strike put option expiring March 17, 2023, with 7,657 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 765,700 underlying shares of NEM. Below is a chart showing NEM’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $45 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for CROX options, DCT options, or NEM options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
JXSB Historical Stock Prices
FOL Options Chain
Top Ten Hedge Funds Holding SWIR
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
[ad_2]
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.